Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Atom N570
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Atom N570
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is positioned at rank 549 and the Atom N570 is on rank 35, so the Atom N570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Performance Per Dollar Atom N570
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron Dual-Core T1500 | Atom N570 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron Dual-Core T1500 | Atom N570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($49) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Atom N570
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.87 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,625 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom N570
The Atom N570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,630 points. Launch price was $86.
Processing Power
The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom N570's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 versus 1.67 GHz on the Atom N570 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T1500. The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom N570 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 scores 1,625 against the Atom N570's 1,630 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom N570.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1500 | Atom N570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.87 GHz+12% | 1.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,625 | 1,630 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 versus DDR3-667 on the Atom N570 — the Atom N570 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron Dual-Core T1500 supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron Dual-Core T1500) vs 1 (Atom N570). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GM965,GL960 (Celeron Dual-Core T1500) and Intel NM10 (Atom N570).
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1500 | Atom N570 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-667+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T1500) / not specified (Atom N570). The Atom N570 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T1500 rivals Pentium T2390.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T1500 | Atom N570 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel GMA 3150 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and Atom N570
