Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Pentium E2200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Pentium E2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Pentium E2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
2.4% HIGHER MSRP
$86 MSRPvs$84 MSRP

Pentium E2200

2007

Why buy it

✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (985 vs 1,005).
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T3300 better than Pentium E2200?

Yes. Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron Dual-Core T3300 comes in 2.4% more expensive on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium E2200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 0.3% better value on paper (11.7 vs 11.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Pentium E2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E2200

The Pentium E2200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 985 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 scores 1,005 against the Pentium E2200's 985 — a 2% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T3300.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Pentium E2200
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	—
PassMark	1,005+2%	985
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	520	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium E2200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Pentium E2200
Socket	P	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) / not specified (Pentium E2200). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 rivals Pentium T4200.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Pentium E2200
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	No	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 was priced at $86, while the Pentium E2200 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($86 vs $84), Pentium E2200 was $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 delivers 11.7 pts/$ vs 11.7 pts/$ for the Pentium E2200 — making the Pentium E2200 the 0.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Pentium E2200
MSRP	$86	$84-2%
Performance per Dollar	11.7	11.7
Release Date	2010	2007

Search Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on Amazon

Search Pentium E2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.