Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Core i3-2348M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Core i3-2348M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Core i3-2348M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,275 vs 1,286).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Core i3-2348M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2348M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-2348M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2348M better than Celeron Dual-Core T3500?

Yes. Core i3-2348M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 17 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2348M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 17 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2348M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2348M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-2348M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 17 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron Dual-Core T3500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (15.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2348M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Core i3-2348M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

Core i3-2348M

The Core i3-2348M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,286 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2348M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-2348M — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-2348M. The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-2348M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 scores 1,275 against the Core i3-2348M's 1,286 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i3-2348M.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3500	Core i3-2348M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	2.3 GHz+10%
Base Clock	—	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,275	1,286

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2348M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 versus 1333 on the Core i3-2348M — the Core i3-2348M supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2348M supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500) vs 16 (Core i3-2348M) — the Core i3-2348M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45,GM47 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i3-2348M).

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3500	Core i3-2348M
Socket	P	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	800	1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	8	16+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron Dual-Core T3500) vs true (Core i3-2348M). The Core i3-2348M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3500 rivals Pentium T4400; Core i3-2348M rivals Core i3-2330M.