Celeron Dual-Core T3500
VS
Pentium U5400

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Pentium U5400

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium U5400

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is positioned at rank 959 and the Pentium U5400 is on rank 1219, so the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T3500

#947
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1841%
#948
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1814%
#949
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1665%
#950
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1657%
#951
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1642%
#953
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1586%
#954
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1521%
#955
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1518%
#956
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1477%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
100%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
98%
#968
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
96%
#970
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
96%
#971
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium U5400

#1207
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6593%
#1208
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6497%
#1209
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5964%
#1210
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5937%
#1211
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5883%
#1213
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5681%
#1214
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5447%
#1215
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5438%
#1216
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
5292%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
100%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
100%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
94%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
91%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
91%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
91%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
90%
#1228
Core i7-620UM
MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A
88%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
85%
#1232
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
75%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium U5400 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron Dual-Core T3500Pentium U5400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($214)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 93% cheaper ($15 vs $214) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron Dual-Core T3500Pentium U5400
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1314%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($214)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Pentium U5400

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Pentium U5400

The Pentium U5400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,286 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Pentium U5400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 versus 1.2 GHz on the Pentium U5400 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T3500. The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium U5400 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 scores 1,275 against the Pentium U5400's 1,286 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium U5400.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T3500Pentium U5400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz+75%
1.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,275
1,286
Geekbench 6 Single
170
Geekbench 6 Multi
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium U5400 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium U5400 — the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500) vs 16 (Pentium U5400) — the Pentium U5400 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45,GM47 (Celeron Dual-Core T3500) and HM55 (Pentium U5400).

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T3500Pentium U5400
Socket
P
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
800+26567%
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
8
8 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Celeron Dual-Core T3500) vs VT-x (Pentium U5400). The Pentium U5400 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3500 targets Budget, Pentium U5400 targets Legacy Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3500 rivals Pentium T4400.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T3500Pentium U5400
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Legacy Budget Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 launched at $80 MSRP, while the Pentium U5400 debuted at $289. At current prices ($15 vs $214), the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is $199 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 delivers 85.0 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Pentium U5400 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 the 173.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core T3500Pentium U5400
MSRP
$80-72%
$289
Avg Price (30d)
$15-93%
$214
Performance per Dollar
85.0+1317%
6.0
Release Date
2010
2010