Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Pentium SU2700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 12.7 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 10W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,268 vs 1,275).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.7 vs 15.9 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌900% higher power demand at 10W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T3500 better than Pentium SU2700?

Yes. Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 17 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 17 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core T3500 comes in $20 cheaper on MSRP at $80 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 17 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 25.7% better value on MSRP (15.9 vs 12.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T3500. Both are built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 scores 1,275 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T3500.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3500	Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz+62%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,275	1,268

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3500	Pentium SU2700
Socket	P	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Celeron Dual-Core T3500) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3500 rivals Pentium T4400.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3500	Pentium SU2700
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	false	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 was priced at $80, while the Pentium SU2700 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($80 vs $100), Celeron Dual-Core T3500 was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 delivers 15.9 pts/$ vs 12.7 pts/$ for the Pentium SU2700 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 the 22.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3500	Pentium SU2700
MSRP	$80-20%	$100
Performance per Dollar	15.9+25%	12.7
Release Date	2010	2009

Search Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on Amazon

Search Pentium SU2700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.