Celeron E1200 vs Core i5-10400F
Celeron E1200
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron E1200 is positioned at rank #952 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1200
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron E1200 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($98) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron E1200 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1782%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($98) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron E1200 and Core i5-10400F
Celeron E1200
The Celeron E1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $40.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Celeron E1200 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron E1200 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 91.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Celeron E1200 uses the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E1200 scores 665 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 180.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 210 vs 1,454, a 149.5% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 380 vs 5,783 (175.3% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E1200 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Celeron E1200 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz+169% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz+81% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (total)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Allendale (2006−2009) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 665 | 13,029+1859% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 210 | 1,454+592% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 380 | 5,783+1422% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron E1200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1200 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron E1200) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: G31,P35,G41 (Celeron E1200) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Celeron E1200 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR4-2666+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron E1200) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Celeron E1200 targets Budget, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron E1200 rivals Pentium E2140; Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Celeron E1200 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Celeron E1200 launched at $53 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($98 vs $102), the Celeron E1200 is $4 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1200 delivers 6.8 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 179.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron E1200 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $53-67% | $160 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $98-4% | $102 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.8 | 127.7+1778% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron E1200 and Core i5-10400F
