Celeron G1820T vs Pro A6-8500B

Celeron G1820T vs Pro A6-8500B Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1820T

2 / 2

1,599

+0.4%

1,592

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820T vs Pro A6-8500B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820T vs Pro A6-8500B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820T

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Pro A6-8500B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌5300% higher power demand at 54W vs 1W.

Pro A6-8500B

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 54W, a 53W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,592 vs 1,599).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1820T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A6-8500B better than Celeron G1820T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pro A6-8500B is ahead with a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820T pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A6-8500B still makes the most sense overall. Pro A6-8500B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A6-8500B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1820T vs Pro A6-8500B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820T

The Celeron G1820T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,599 points. Launch price was $42.

Pro A6-8500B

The Pro A6-8500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,592 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1820T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pro A6-8500B's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1820T versus 3 GHz on the Pro A6-8500B — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pro A6-8500B (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron G1820T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pro A6-8500B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820T scores 1,599 against the Pro A6-8500B's 1,592 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G1820T.

Feature	Celeron G1820T	Pro A6-8500B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+50%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	1,599	1,592
Geekbench 6 Single	415	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A6-8500B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1820T	Pro A6-8500B
Socket	LGA1150	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1820T) / not specified (Pro A6-8500B). The Celeron G1820T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Pro A6-8500B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820T rivals Pentium G3220T.