Celeron G3900T vs Pentium G3220

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3900T vs Pentium G3220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3900T vs Pentium G3220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3900T

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $54 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.2 vs 34.9 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $54 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).

Pentium G3220

2013

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,885 vs 1,900).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.9 vs 45.2 PassMark/$ ($54 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3900T better than Pentium G3220?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G3220 is ahead with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3900T pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Pentium G3220 also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3900T is the better buy right now. Celeron G3900T comes in $12 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $54 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium G3220 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 29.6% better value on MSRP (45.2 vs 34.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3900T vs Pentium G3220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3900T

The Celeron G3900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,900 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G3220

The Pentium G3220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,885 points. Launch price was $71.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3900T and Pentium G3220 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G3900T versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G3220 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G3220 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Celeron G3900T uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G3220 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3900T scores 1,900 against the Pentium G3220's 1,885 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G3900T. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G3900T vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3220.

Feature	Celeron G3900T	Pentium G3220
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	3 GHz+15%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache	2 MB	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,900	1,885
Geekbench 6 Single	514	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	903	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3220 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Celeron G3900T versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G3220 — the Celeron G3900T supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Celeron G3900T	Pentium G3220
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 510 (Celeron G3900T) and HD Graphics (Pentium G3220) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900T targets Budget, Pentium G3220 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900T rivals Pentium G4400T.

Feature	Celeron G3900T	Pentium G3220
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 510	HD Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3900T was priced at $42, while the Pentium G3220 came in at $54. On launch pricing ($42 vs $54), Celeron G3900T was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3900T delivers 45.2 pts/$ vs 34.9 pts/$ for the Pentium G3220 — making the Celeron G3900T the 25.8% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3900T	Pentium G3220
MSRP	$42-22%	$54
Performance per Dollar	45.2+30%	34.9
Release Date	2015	2013

Search Celeron G3900T on Amazon

Search Pentium G3220 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.