Celeron G440
VS
Celeron 2981U

Celeron G440 vs Celeron 2981U

Intel

Celeron G440

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron 2981U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G440 is positioned at rank 625 and the Celeron 2981U is on rank 426, so the Celeron 2981U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G440

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11145%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10531%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7646%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2303%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1825%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1596%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
914%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
902%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
822%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
821%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
812%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
790%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
779%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
776%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
769%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
99%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
98%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
100%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
99%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
100%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
99%
#629
Core i3-8350K
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
99%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
98%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
98%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
98%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
98%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
97%
#640
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2981U

#414
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
566%
#415
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
558%
#416
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
512%
#417
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
510%
#418
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
505%
#420
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
488%
#421
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
468%
#422
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
467%
#423
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
455%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Celeron 2981U shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightCeleron G440Celeron 2981U
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($137)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron G440 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $5 (vs $137), it costs 96% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 2637% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Celeron 2981U.
InsightCeleron G440Celeron 2981U
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2637%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($137)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G440 and Celeron 2981U

Intel

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

Intel

Celeron 2981U

The Celeron 2981U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,036 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron G440 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron 2981U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 2981U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 2981U — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron G440 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 2981U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G440 scores 1,035 against the Celeron 2981U's 1,036 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 2981U. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron G440 vs 2 MB on the Celeron 2981U.

FeatureCeleron G440Celeron 2981U
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB
512 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,035
1,036
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G440 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2981U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G440 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G440) vs 12 (Celeron 2981U) — the Celeron G440 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G440) and Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 2981U).

FeatureCeleron G440Celeron 2981U
Socket
LGA1155
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G440) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron 2981U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G440 targets Budget, Celeron 2981U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630; Celeron 2981U rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureCeleron G440Celeron 2981U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G440 launched at $37 MSRP, while the Celeron 2981U debuted at $137.

FeatureCeleron G440Celeron 2981U
MSRP
$37-73%
$137
Avg Price (30d)
$5
Release Date
2011
2014