Celeron G4900
VS
A8-3870K

Celeron G4900 vs A8-3870K

Intel

Celeron G4900

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018
VS
AMD

A8-3870K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4900

#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
149%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
140%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
140%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
138%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
133%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
130%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
128%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
124%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
124%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
119%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
117%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
116%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
109%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
102%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
101%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
100%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
99%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
94%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
92%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
85%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
80%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
73%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
71%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
50%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
28%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3870K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7926%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7489%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5438%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1638%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1298%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1135%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
650%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
642%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
584%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
584%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
578%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
562%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
554%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
552%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
547%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
100%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
99%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
99%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
98%
#502
A8-3870K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
99%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
98%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G4900 (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G4900A8-3870K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A8-3870K (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G4900A8-3870K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G4900 and A8-3870K

Intel

Celeron G4900

The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

AMD

A8-3870K

The A8-3870K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,360 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Celeron G4900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-3870K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3870K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 versus 3 GHz on the A8-3870K — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G4900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Celeron G4900 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the A8-3870K uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900 scores 2,370 against the A8-3870K's 2,360 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G4900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 850 vs 380, a 76.4% lead for the Celeron G4900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900 vs 0 kB on the A8-3870K.

FeatureCeleron G4900A8-3870K
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+3%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+3%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,370
2,360
Geekbench 6 Single
850+124%
380
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-3870K uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900 versus DDR3-1866 on the A8-3870K — the Celeron G4900 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4900 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G4900) vs 20 (A8-3870K) — the A8-3870K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900) and A55,A75 (A8-3870K).

FeatureCeleron G4900A8-3870K
Socket
LGA1151
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+100%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A8-3870K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4900) vs AMD-V (A8-3870K). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4900) and Radeon HD 6550D (A8-3870K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900 targets Budget, A8-3870K targets Budget Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400; A8-3870K rivals Core i3-2125.

FeatureCeleron G4900A8-3870K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Radeon HD 6550D
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Budget Gaming Desktop