Celeron G4900
VS
Athlon II X4 645

Celeron G4900 vs Athlon II X4 645

Intel

Celeron G4900

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2018
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 645

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4900

#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
149%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
140%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
140%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
138%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
133%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
130%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
128%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
124%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
124%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
119%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
117%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
116%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
109%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
102%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
101%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
100%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
99%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
96%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
95%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
94%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
92%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
85%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
80%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
73%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
71%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
50%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
28%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 645

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16537%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15625%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11345%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3418%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2707%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2368%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1356%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1339%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1219%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1219%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1205%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1173%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1156%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1152%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1141%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
96%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
100%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
99%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
99%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
99%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
98%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
98%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
97%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
97%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
97%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
97%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G4900 (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G4900Athlon II X4 645
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($20)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X4 645 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G4900Athlon II X4 645
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+326%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G4900 and Athlon II X4 645

Intel

Celeron G4900

The Celeron G4900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,370 points. Launch price was $42.

AMD

Athlon II X4 645

The Athlon II X4 645 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,375 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The Celeron G4900 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X4 645 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 645 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Celeron G4900 versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon II X4 645 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Celeron G4900 uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G4900 scores 2,370 against the Athlon II X4 645's 2,375 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X4 645. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 850 vs 399, a 72.2% lead for the Celeron G4900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,550 vs 1,374 (12% advantage for the Celeron G4900). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 645.

FeatureCeleron G4900Athlon II X4 645
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,370
2,375
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,374
Geekbench 6 Single
850+113%
399
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,550+13%
1,374
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G4900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 645 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900 versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 645 — the Celeron G4900 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4900 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900) and AMD 700 Series,AMD 800 Series,AMD 900 Series (Athlon II X4 645).

FeatureCeleron G4900Athlon II X4 645
Socket
LGA1151
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G4900) vs Yes (Athlon II X4 645). The Celeron G4900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Athlon II X4 645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4900 targets Budget, Athlon II X4 645 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900 rivals Pentium G5400.

FeatureCeleron G4900Athlon II X4 645
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Yes
Target Use
Budget
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron G4900 launched at $42 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 645 debuted at $126. At current prices ($85 vs $20), the Athlon II X4 645 is $65 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G4900 delivers 27.9 pts/$ vs 118.8 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 645 — making the Athlon II X4 645 the 123.9% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G4900Athlon II X4 645
MSRP
$42-67%
$126
Avg Price (30d)
$85
$20-76%
Performance per Dollar
27.9
118.8+326%
Release Date
2018
2010