Celeron G5905 vs Core i5-13400F

Intel

Celeron G5905

2 Cores2 Thrd58 WW2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
Core family
·······

Celeron G5905 vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5905 vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5905 vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5905

2020

Why buy it

  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,242 vs 11,408).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 20 MB).
  • Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +240.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G5905.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $196 MSRP, while Celeron G5905 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5905 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Celeron G5905?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 240.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 818.5% better Geekbench multi-core, 806.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 240.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 818.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in at an unclear MSRP at $196 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 240.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Celeron G5905 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 400% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G5905 vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G5905

The Celeron G5905 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,760 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Celeron G5905 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. The Core i5-13400F is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5905 scores 2,760 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 160.3% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 724 vs 2,407, a 107.5% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,242 vs 11,408 (160.7% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureCeleron G5905Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+40%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
20 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
2,760
25,029+807%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
724
2,407+232%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,242
11,408+819%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5905 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5905 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5905) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5905) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

FeatureCeleron G5905Core i5-13400F
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
192 GB+50%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5905) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Celeron G5905 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5905 targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron G5905 rivals Pentium Gold G6405; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCeleron G5905Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Gaming