PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5925

2020

Why buy it

✅+90% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 18 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.3 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +232.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Delivers 147.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 45.3 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 1,248).
❌
180.6% HIGHER MSRP
$174 MSRPvs$62 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5925 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-12400F better than Celeron G5925?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-12400F is ahead with a 232.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5925 pulls ahead with 90% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i5-12400F also has the bigger cache pool with 350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5925 is the stronger fit. You are getting 90% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-12400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-12400F comes in 180.6% more expensive on MSRP at $174 MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you a 232.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron G5925 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 90% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 147.9% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 45.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Celeron G5925 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and 350% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 4 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5925

The Celeron G5925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,808 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5925 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 4 more cores. The Core i5-12400F is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5925 scores 2,808 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 149.7% lead for the Core i5-12400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 756 vs 1,700, a 76.9% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,248 vs 657 (62% advantage for the Celeron G5925). L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5925 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	—	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+44%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache	18 MB (total)+350%
L2 Cache	—	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	—	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	2,808	19,532+596%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	12,380
Geekbench 6 Single	756	1,700+125%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248+90%	657

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5925 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5925 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5925) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5925) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i5-12400F
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5925) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The Celeron G5925 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5925 targets Budget, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Celeron G5925 rivals Pentium Gold G6405; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget	Gaming Performance/Value

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5925 was priced at $62, while the Core i5-12400F came in at $174. On launch pricing ($62 vs $174), Celeron G5925 was $112 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5925 delivers 45.3 pts/$ vs 112.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 85% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i5-12400F
MSRP	$62-64%	$174
Performance per Dollar	45.3	112.3+148%
Release Date	2020	2022

Search Celeron G5925 on Amazon

Search Core i5-12400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.