PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5925 vs Xeon X3440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5925 vs Xeon X3440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5925

2020

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
✅Delivers 251.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.3 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
✅Draws 58W instead of 95W, a 37W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3440 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X3440, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X3440

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,769 vs 2,808).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 45.3 PassMark/$ ($215 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
❌63.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 58W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5925 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5925 better than Xeon X3440?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3440 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G5925 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5925 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5925 is the better buy right now. Celeron G5925 comes in $153 cheaper on MSRP at $62 MSRP versus $215 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X3440 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 251.7% better value on MSRP (45.3 vs 12.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5925 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G5925 vs Xeon X3440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5925

The Celeron G5925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,808 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X3440

The Xeon X3440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,769 points. Launch price was $215.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5925 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X3440 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon X3440 has 2 more cores. The Xeon X3440 is built on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5925 scores 2,808 against the Xeon X3440's 2,769 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron G5925. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5925 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3440.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Xeon X3440
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	—	2.93 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+42%	2.53 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	—	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,808+1%	2,769
Geekbench 6 Single	756	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5925 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3440 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Xeon X3440
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5925) / not specified (Xeon X3440). The Celeron G5925 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon X3440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5925 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5925 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Xeon X3440
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5925 was priced at $62, while the Xeon X3440 came in at $215. On launch pricing ($62 vs $215), Celeron G5925 was $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5925 delivers 45.3 pts/$ vs 12.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X3440 — making the Celeron G5925 the 111.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Xeon X3440
MSRP	$62-71%	$215
Performance per Dollar	45.3+251%	12.9
Release Date	2020	2009

Search Celeron G5925 on Amazon

Search Xeon X3440 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.