
Celeron J1750

Ryzen 7 5800X
Celeron J1750 vs Ryzen 7 5800X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron J1750 vs Ryzen 7 5800X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron J1750 vs Ryzen 7 5800X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron J1750
2013Why buy it
- β Draws 1W instead of 105W, a 104W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Ryzen 7 5800X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (505 vs 27,712).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +1748.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +3100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1 MB).
- β 500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Celeron J1750 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β10400% higher power demand at 105W vs 1W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron J1750 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800X better than Celeron J1750?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron J1750 vs Ryzen 7 5800X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1750
The Celeron J1750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $72.


Ryzen 7 5800X
The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Celeron J1750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 5800X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.41 GHz on the Celeron J1750 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X β a 64.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X (base: 2.41 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Celeron J1750 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1750 scores 505 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 β a 192.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1750 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2.41 GHz | 4.7 GHz+95% |
| Base Clock | 2.41 GHz | 3.8 GHz+58% |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 505 | 27,712+5388% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 250 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1750 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800X β the Ryzen 7 5800X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1750) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800X) β the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1750) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 5800X).
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333 | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 24+500% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J1750) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). The Celeron J1750 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Ryzen 7 5800X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1750 targets Low Power, Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron J1750 rivals Pentium J2850.
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Ryzen 7 5800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Low Power | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













