Celeron J1750
VS
Sempron 130

Celeron J1750 vs Sempron 130

Intel

Celeron J1750

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.41 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Sempron 130

1 Cores1 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1750 is positioned at rank 1234 and the Sempron 130 is on rank 880, so the Sempron 130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1750

#1222
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
10787%
#1223
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
10629%
#1224
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
9757%
#1225
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
9713%
#1226
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
9624%
#1228
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
9294%
#1229
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
8912%
#1230
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
8897%
#1231
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
8658%
#1234
Celeron J1750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
87%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
79%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
76%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
75%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
68%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
62%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 130

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
19159%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18103%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13144%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3960%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3137%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2744%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1572%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1551%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1412%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1412%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1396%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1359%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1340%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1334%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1322%
#880
Sempron 130
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#881
Pentium G6960
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
99%
#882
Core i5-2500T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
99%
#884
Athlon II X2 265
MSRP: $83|Avg: $15
98%
#885
Core i3-2100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $10
97%
#886
A8-3800
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
97%
#887
Pentium E5200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
96%
#888
Athlon II X2 235e
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
96%
#889
Athlon II X2 250e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $15
96%
#890
Core i7-2600S
MSRP: $297|Avg: $99
96%
#891
Athlon II X2 250u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
96%
#892
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
96%
#893
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
96%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron 130 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron J1750 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron J1750Sempron 130
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sargas (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron J1750Sempron 130
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1750 and Sempron 130

Intel

Celeron J1750

The Celeron J1750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $72.

AMD

Sempron 130

The Sempron 130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sargas (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 488 points. Launch price was $25.

Processing Power

The Celeron J1750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Sempron 130 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron J1750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.41 GHz on the Celeron J1750 versus 2.6 GHz on the Sempron 130 — a 7.6% clock advantage for the Sempron 130 (base: 2.41 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron J1750 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Sempron 130 uses Sargas (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1750 scores 505 against the Sempron 130's 488 — a 3.4% lead for the Celeron J1750. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1750 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 130.

FeatureCeleron J1750Sempron 130
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.41 GHz
2.6 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.41 GHz
2.6 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-D (2013)
Sargas (2009−2011)
PassMark
505+3%
488
Geekbench 6 Single
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 130 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron J1750Sempron 130
Socket
FCBGA1170
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1750) / not specified (Sempron 130). The Celeron J1750 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Sempron 130 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1750 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1750 rivals Pentium J2850.

FeatureCeleron J1750Sempron 130
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power