CPU
GPU
Celeron J1750
Sempron 3600+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1750 is positioned at rank 1234 and the Sempron 3600+ is on rank 1075, so the Sempron 3600+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1750
Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3600+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J1750 | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Manila (2001−2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J1750 | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1750 and Sempron 3600+
Celeron J1750
The Celeron J1750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $72.
Sempron 3600+
The Sempron 3600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manila (2001−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 485 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
The Celeron J1750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Sempron 3600+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron J1750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.41 GHz on the Celeron J1750 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3600+ — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Celeron J1750. The Celeron J1750 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Sempron 3600+ uses Manila (2001−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1750 scores 505 against the Sempron 3600+'s 485 — a 4% lead for the Celeron J1750. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1750 vs 0 kB on the Sempron 3600+.
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.41 GHz+21% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.41 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256K |
| Process | 22 nm-76% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Manila (2001−2006) |
| PassMark | 505+4% | 485 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1750 versus DDR2-800 on the Sempron 3600+ — the Celeron J1750 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron J1750 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron J1750) vs 1 (Sempron 3600+). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1750) vs 0 (Sempron 3600+) — the Celeron J1750 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J1750) vs None (Sempron 3600+). The Celeron J1750 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Sempron 3600+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1750 targets Low Power, Sempron 3600+ targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron J1750 rivals Pentium J2850.
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Sempron 3600+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | None |
| Target Use | Low Power | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J1750 and Sempron 3600+
