Celeron J1750 vs Pentium M 760

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J1750 vs Pentium M 760 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J1750 vs Pentium M 760: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J1750

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 27W, a 26W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium M 760 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (150 vs 240).
❌Lower PassMark (505 vs 515).

Pentium M 760

2005

Why buy it

✅+60% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌2600% higher power demand at 27W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1750 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 760 better than Celeron J1750?

Yes. Pentium M 760 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 760 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 760 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 760 still makes the most sense overall. Pentium M 760 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2005). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J1750 vs Pentium M 760 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1750

The Celeron J1750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $72.

Pentium M 760

The Pentium M 760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J1750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium M 760 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron J1750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.41 GHz on the Celeron J1750 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium M 760 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Celeron J1750 (base: 2.41 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron J1750 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium M 760 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1750 scores 505 against the Pentium M 760's 515 — a 2% lead for the Pentium M 760. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 150 vs 240, a 46.2% lead for the Pentium M 760 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1750 vs 0 kB on the Pentium M 760.

Feature	Celeron J1750	Pentium M 760
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.41 GHz+21%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.41 GHz+21%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	22 nm-76%	90 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	505	515+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	150	240+60%
Geekbench 6 Multi	250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 760 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1750 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 760 — the Celeron J1750 supports 150.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron J1750 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1750) vs 0 (Pentium M 760) — the Celeron J1750 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1750) and 915GM,915PM (Pentium M 760).

Feature	Celeron J1750	Pentium M 760
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333+150%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1750) / not specified (Pentium M 760). The Celeron J1750 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium M 760 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1750 targets Low Power, Pentium M 760 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron J1750 rivals Pentium J2850; Pentium M 760 rivals Pentium M 750.