CPU
GPU
Celeron J1750
Atom D510
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1750 is positioned at rank 1234 and the Atom D510 is on rank 626, so the Atom D510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1750
Performance Per Dollar Atom D510
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J1750 | Atom D510 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Pineview (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J1750 | Atom D510 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1750 and Atom D510
Celeron J1750
The Celeron J1750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $72.
Atom D510
The Atom D510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 December 2009 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $97.
Processing Power
The Celeron J1750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom D510's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.41 GHz on the Celeron J1750 versus 1.67 GHz on the Atom D510 — a 36.3% clock advantage for the Celeron J1750 (base: 2.41 GHz vs 1.66 GHz). The Celeron J1750 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Atom D510 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1750 scores 505 against the Atom D510's 525 — a 3.9% lead for the Atom D510. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 150 vs 130, a 14.3% lead for the Celeron J1750 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 250 vs 350 (33.3% advantage for the Atom D510). L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1750 vs 0 kB on the Atom D510.
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Atom D510 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.41 GHz+44% | 1.67 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.41 GHz+45% | 1.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 505 | 525+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150+15% | 130 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 250 | 350+40% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom D510 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1750 versus DDR2-800 on the Atom D510 — the Celeron J1750 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron J1750 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron J1750) vs 1 (Atom D510). Both provide 4 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1750) and NM10 (Atom D510).
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Atom D510 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J1750) vs None (Atom D510). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron J1750) and Intel GMA 3150 (Atom D510) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1750 targets Low Power, Atom D510 targets Nettop. Direct competitor: Celeron J1750 rivals Pentium J2850.
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Atom D510 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Intel GMA 3150 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | None |
| Target Use | Low Power | Nettop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J1750 and Atom D510
