CPU
GPU
Celeron J1750
Celeron 807
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1750 is positioned at rank 1234 and the Celeron 807 is on rank 1141, so the Celeron 807 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1750
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 807
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J1750 | Celeron 807 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J1750 | Celeron 807 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1750 and Celeron 807
Celeron J1750
The Celeron J1750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $72.
Celeron 807
The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
The Celeron J1750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron 807 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.41 GHz on the Celeron J1750 versus 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 807 — a 46.5% clock advantage for the Celeron J1750 (base: 2.41 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Celeron J1750 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron 807 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1750 scores 505 against the Celeron 807's 535 — a 5.8% lead for the Celeron 807. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1750 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807.
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Celeron 807 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.41 GHz+61% | 1.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.41 GHz+61% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 1.5 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 505 | 535+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 807 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The Celeron 807 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1750) vs 0 (Celeron 807) — the Celeron J1750 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1750) and QM67,QS67,HM67,HM65 (Celeron 807).
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Celeron 807 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron J1750) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron 807) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1750 targets Low Power, Celeron 807 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron J1750 rivals Pentium J2850.
| Feature | Celeron J1750 | Celeron 807 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Low Power | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J1750 and Celeron 807
