Celeron J1750
VS
Turion 64 ML-30

Celeron J1750 vs Turion 64 ML-30

Intel

Celeron J1750

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.41 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Turion 64 ML-30

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1750 is positioned at rank 1234 and the Turion 64 ML-30 is on rank 961, so the Turion 64 ML-30 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1750

#1222
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
10787%
#1223
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
10629%
#1224
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
9757%
#1225
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
9713%
#1226
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
9624%
#1228
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
9294%
#1229
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
8912%
#1230
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
8897%
#1231
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
8658%
#1234
Celeron J1750
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
87%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
79%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
76%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
75%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
68%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
62%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 ML-30

#948
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1853%
#949
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1826%
#950
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1677%
#951
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1669%
#952
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1654%
#954
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1597%
#955
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1531%
#956
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1529%
#957
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1488%
#961
Turion 64 ML-30
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#962
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
99%
#967
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
97%
#969
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
96%
#970
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J1750 (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron J1750Turion 64 ML-30
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lancaster (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion 64 ML-30 (2005) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron J1750Turion 64 ML-30
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1750 and Turion 64 ML-30

Intel

Celeron J1750

The Celeron J1750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 505 points. Launch price was $72.

AMD

Turion 64 ML-30

The Turion 64 ML-30 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Lancaster (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron J1750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Turion 64 ML-30 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron J1750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.41 GHz on the Celeron J1750 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 ML-30 — a 40.4% clock advantage for the Celeron J1750. The Celeron J1750 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 ML-30 uses Lancaster (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1750 scores 505 against the Turion 64 ML-30's 475 — a 6.1% lead for the Celeron J1750. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1750 vs 0 kB on the Turion 64 ML-30.

FeatureCeleron J1750Turion 64 ML-30
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.41 GHz+51%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.41 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
22 nm-76%
90 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-D (2013)
Lancaster (2005−2006)
PassMark
505+6%
475
Geekbench 6 Single
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1750 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 ML-30 uses 754 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron J1750Turion 64 ML-30
Socket
FCBGA1170
754
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1750) / not specified (Turion 64 ML-30). The Celeron J1750 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Turion 64 ML-30 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1750 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1750 rivals Pentium J2850.

FeatureCeleron J1750Turion 64 ML-30
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power