
Celeron J4025

Phenom II X3 700e
Celeron J4025 vs Phenom II X3 700e Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron J4025 vs Phenom II X3 700e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron J4025 vs Phenom II X3 700e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron J4025
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Phenom II X3 700e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,450 vs 1,451).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Phenom II X3 700e
2009Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $125 MSRP, while Celeron J4025 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4025 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron J4025 better than Phenom II X3 700e?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron J4025 vs Phenom II X3 700e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4025
The Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom II X3 700e
The Phenom II X3 700e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Celeron J4025 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X3 700e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom II X3 700e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron J4025 versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X3 700e — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Celeron J4025 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron J4025 uses the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X3 700e uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4025 scores 1,450 against the Phenom II X3 700e's 1,451 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X3 700e. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4025 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 700e.
| Feature | Celeron J4025 | Phenom II X3 700e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 3 / 3+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+21% | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+20% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Heka (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,450 | 1,451 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 250 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 650 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X3 700e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4025 versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 700e — the Celeron J4025 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Phenom II X3 700e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4025) vs 16 (Phenom II X3 700e) — the Phenom II X3 700e offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1090 (Celeron J4025) and AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 700e).
| Feature | Celeron J4025 | Phenom II X3 700e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400+80% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | 16+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X3 700e has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Celeron J4025) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X3 700e). The Celeron J4025 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Phenom II X3 700e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Phenom II X3 700e targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron J4025 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.
| Feature | Celeron J4025 | Phenom II X3 700e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















