Celeron J4025 vs Phenom II X3 700e

Intel

Celeron J4025

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Phenom II X3 700e

3 Cores3 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Celeron J4025 vs Phenom II X3 700e Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4025 vs Phenom II X3 700e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4025 vs Phenom II X3 700e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4025

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Phenom II X3 700e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,450 vs 1,451).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Phenom II X3 700e

2009

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $125 MSRP, while Celeron J4025 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4025 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4025 better than Phenom II X3 700e?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron J4025 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X3 700e pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Phenom II X3 700e also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X3 700e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron J4025 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron J4025 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $125 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Phenom II X3 700e only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron J4025 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4025 vs Phenom II X3 700e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron J4025

The Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

Phenom II X3 700e

The Phenom II X3 700e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Celeron J4025 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X3 700e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom II X3 700e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron J4025 versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom II X3 700e — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Celeron J4025 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron J4025 uses the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X3 700e uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4025 scores 1,450 against the Phenom II X3 700e's 1,451 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom II X3 700e. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4025 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 700e.

FeatureCeleron J4025Phenom II X3 700e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+21%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.4 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Heka (2009−2010)
PassMark
1,450
1,451
Geekbench 6 Single
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X3 700e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4025 versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 700e — the Celeron J4025 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Phenom II X3 700e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4025) vs 16 (Phenom II X3 700e) — the Phenom II X3 700e offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1090 (Celeron J4025) and AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 700e).

FeatureCeleron J4025Phenom II X3 700e
Socket
FCBGA1090
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
2400+80%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
6
16+167%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Phenom II X3 700e has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Celeron J4025) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X3 700e). The Celeron J4025 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Phenom II X3 700e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Phenom II X3 700e targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron J4025 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.

FeatureCeleron J4025Phenom II X3 700e
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 600
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop