Celeron J4025 vs Phenom X3 8750

Celeron J4025 vs Phenom X3 8750 Performance Spectrum

Celeron J4025

2 / 2

1,450

+0.3%

1,445

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4025 vs Phenom X3 8750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4025 vs Phenom X3 8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4025

2019

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 10W instead of 95W, a 85W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Phenom X3 8750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Phenom X3 8750

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,445 vs 1,450).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $195 MSRP, while Celeron J4025 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌850% higher power demand at 95W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4025 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4025 better than Phenom X3 8750?

Yes. Celeron J4025 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron J4025 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4025 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J4025 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron J4025 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $195 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Phenom X3 8750 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (7.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4025 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2008), 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J4025 vs Phenom X3 8750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4025

The Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom X3 8750

The Phenom X3 8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,445 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J4025 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8750 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron J4025 versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X3 8750 — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Celeron J4025. The Celeron J4025 uses the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4025 scores 1,450 against the Phenom X3 8750's 1,445 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron J4025. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4025 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8750.

Feature	Celeron J4025	Phenom X3 8750
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+21%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	Toliman (2008)
PassMark	1,450	1,445

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X3 8750 uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4025	Phenom X3 8750
Socket	FCBGA1090	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4025) / not specified (Phenom X3 8750). The Celeron J4025 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Phenom X3 8750 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4025 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.