CPU
GPU
Celeron J4025
Xeon X5272
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J4025 is positioned at rank 537 and the Xeon X5272 is on rank 1029, so the Celeron J4025 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4025
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5272
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J4025 | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($76) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J4025 | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($76) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J4025 and Xeon X5272
Celeron J4025
The Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $107.
Xeon X5272
The Xeon X5272 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,451 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Celeron J4025 is built on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron J4025 scores 1,450 against the Xeon X5272's 1,451 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon X5272. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4025 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5272.
| Feature | Celeron J4025 | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+70% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB L2 Cache+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | — |
| PassMark | 1,450 | 1,451 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5272 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4025 versus DDR2 on the Xeon X5272 — the Celeron J4025 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon X5272 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron J4025) vs 4 (Xeon X5272). PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4025) vs 0 (Xeon X5272) — the Celeron J4025 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1090 (Celeron J4025) and Intel 5100,Intel 5400 (Xeon X5272).
| Feature | Celeron J4025 | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400+119900% | DDR2 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | 128 GB+1677721500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Celeron J4025 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Xeon X5272 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5272 targets Server. Direct competitor: Celeron J4025 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.
| Feature | Celeron J4025 | Xeon X5272 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J4025 and Xeon X5272
