Celeron J4025 vs Turion II P560

Celeron J4025 vs Turion II P560 Performance Spectrum

Celeron J4025

2 / 2

1,450

0.0%

1,455

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4025 vs Turion II P560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4025 vs Turion II P560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4025

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Turion II P560 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,450 vs 1,455).
❌400% higher power demand at 10W vs 2W.

Turion II P560

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 10W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4025 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II P560 better than Celeron J4025?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron J4025 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion II P560 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II P560 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II P560 still makes the most sense overall. Turion II P560 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4025 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron J4025 vs Turion II P560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4025

The Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $107.

Turion II P560

The Turion II P560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J4025 and Turion II P560 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron J4025 versus 2.5 GHz on the Turion II P560 — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Celeron J4025. The Celeron J4025 uses the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion II P560 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4025 scores 1,450 against the Turion II P560's 1,455 — a 0.3% lead for the Turion II P560.

Feature	Celeron J4025	Turion II P560
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+16%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	4 MB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,450	1,455

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II P560 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4025	Turion II P560
Socket	FCBGA1090	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4025) / not specified (Turion II P560). The Celeron J4025 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Turion II P560 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4025 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.