CPU
GPU
Celeron J4025
Phenom X4 9450e
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J4025 is positioned at rank 537 and the Phenom X4 9450e is on rank 1093, so the Celeron J4025 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4025
Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9450e
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J4025 | Phenom X4 9450e |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($430) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J4025 | Phenom X4 9450e |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($430) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J4025 and Phenom X4 9450e
Celeron J4025
The Celeron J4025 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,450 points. Launch price was $107.
Phenom X4 9450e
The Phenom X4 9450e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,455 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Celeron J4025 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9450e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9450e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron J4025 versus 2.1 GHz on the Phenom X4 9450e — a 32% clock advantage for the Celeron J4025. The Celeron J4025 uses the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom X4 9450e uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4025 scores 1,450 against the Phenom X4 9450e's 1,455 — a 0.3% lead for the Phenom X4 9450e. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4025 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9450e.
| Feature | Celeron J4025 | Phenom X4 9450e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+38% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,450 | 1,455 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J4025 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9450e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron J4025 | Phenom X4 9450e |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Celeron J4025) / not specified (Phenom X4 9450e). The Celeron J4025 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Phenom X4 9450e requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4025 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.
| Feature | Celeron J4025 | Phenom X4 9450e |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J4025 and Phenom X4 9450e
