Celeron J4105 vs Pentium G4500

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium G4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium G4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J4105

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 51W, a 41W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Pentium G4500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium G4500 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Pentium G4500

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,800 vs 2,820).
❌Launch MSRP is still $75 MSRP, while Celeron J4105 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌410% higher power demand at 51W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J4105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J4105 better than Pentium G4500?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G4500 is ahead with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4105 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J4105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J4105 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron J4105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Pentium G4500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J4105 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium G4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4105

The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium G4500

The Pentium G4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,800 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J4105 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G4500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J4105 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 versus 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G4500 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G4500 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Celeron J4105 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G4500 uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4105 scores 2,820 against the Pentium G4500's 2,800 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron J4105. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4105 vs 4 MB (total) on the Pentium G4500.

Feature	Celeron J4105	Pentium G4500
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+40%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	3.5 GHz+133%
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Goldmont Plus (2017)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,820	2,800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4500 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J4105	Pentium G4500
Socket	FCBGA1090	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron J4105) / not specified (Pentium G4500). The Celeron J4105 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Pentium G4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.