
Celeron J4105

Ryzen 7 5700X
Celeron J4105 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron J4105 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron J4105 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron J4105
2017Why buy it
- β Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 600, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,820 vs 26,609).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +297.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- β 300% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Celeron J4105 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron J4105 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Celeron J4105?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron J4105 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J4105
The Celeron J4105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,820 points. Launch price was $107.


Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Celeron J4105 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 5700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J4105 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X β a 59.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Celeron J4105 uses the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J4105 scores 2,820 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 β a 161.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron J4105 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Celeron J4105 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz+84% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 3.4 GHz+127% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 512K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Goldmont Plus (2017) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020β2022) |
| PassMark | 2,820 | 26,609+844% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J4105 uses the FCBGA1090 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2400 on the Celeron J4105 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X β the Ryzen 7 5700X supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron J4105) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) β the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 18 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1090 (Celeron J4105) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).
| Feature | Celeron J4105 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2400 | DDR4-3200+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | 24+300% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Celeron J4105) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). The Celeron J4105 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 600), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron J4105 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G; Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Celeron J4105 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













