Celeron M 900
VS
Pentium G3260

Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G3260

Intel

Celeron M 900

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Pentium G3260

2 Cores2 Thrd53 WW2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 900 is positioned at rank 797 and the Pentium G3260 is on rank 556, so the Pentium G3260 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 900

#785
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1201%
#786
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1183%
#787
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1086%
#788
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1081%
#789
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1072%
#791
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1035%
#792
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
992%
#793
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
991%
#794
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
964%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium G3260

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9429%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8909%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6469%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1949%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1544%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1350%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
773%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
763%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
695%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
695%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
687%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
669%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
659%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
657%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
651%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
99%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
100%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
99%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#556
Pentium G3260
MSRP: $64|Avg: $21
100%
#561
Athlon II X2 220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $10
99%
#563
Athlon X4 840
MSRP: $102|Avg: $25
99%
#564
Athlon 5350
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
99%
#566
FX-8320
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
98%
#567
FX-8120
MSRP: $205|Avg: $40
97%
#568
Core i3-7100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $39
97%
#569
Pentium E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
97%
#571
Pentium G620T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $90
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium G3260 (2015) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron M 900Pentium G3260
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($21)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron M 900 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron M 900Pentium G3260
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+109%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($21)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 900 and Pentium G3260

Intel

Celeron M 900

The Celeron M 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,101 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Pentium G3260

The Pentium G3260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,116 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 900 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G3260 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G3260 has 1 more core. The Celeron M 900 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron M 900 scores 2,101 against the Pentium G3260's 2,116 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G3260.

FeatureCeleron M 900Pentium G3260
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,101
2,116
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G3260 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron M 900Pentium G3260
Socket
PGA478
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron M 900 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Pentium G3260 debuted at $64. At current prices ($10 vs $21), the Celeron M 900 is $11 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 900 delivers 210.1 pts/$ vs 100.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G3260 — making the Celeron M 900 the 70.3% better value option.

FeatureCeleron M 900Pentium G3260
MSRP
$86
$64-26%
Avg Price (30d)
$10-52%
$21
Performance per Dollar
210.1+108%
100.8
Release Date
2009
2015