Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G3460

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G3460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G3460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 900

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $63 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 72.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.4 vs 14.2 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 54W, a 53W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,101 vs 2,114).

Pentium G3460

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.2 vs 24.4 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌5300% higher power demand at 54W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G3460 better than Celeron M 900?

Yes. Pentium G3460 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium G3460 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3460 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G3460 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium G3460 comes in 73.3% more expensive on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 900 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 72.2% better value on paper (24.4 vs 14.2 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G3460 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G3460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 900

The Celeron M 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,101 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium G3460

The Pentium G3460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,114 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 900 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G3460 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G3460 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron M 900 versus 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G3460 — a 45.6% clock advantage for the Pentium G3460. The Celeron M 900 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G3460 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 900 scores 2,101 against the Pentium G3460's 2,114 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium G3460.

Feature	Celeron M 900	Pentium G3460
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+59%
Base Clock	—	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,101	2,114

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G3460 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron M 900	Pentium G3460
Socket	PGA478	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron M 900 was priced at $86, while the Pentium G3460 came in at $149. On launch pricing ($86 vs $149), Celeron M 900 was $63 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 900 delivers 24.4 pts/$ vs 14.2 pts/$ for the Pentium G3460 — making the Celeron M 900 the 53% better value option.

Feature	Celeron M 900	Pentium G3460
MSRP	$86-42%	$149
Performance per Dollar	24.4+72%	14.2
Release Date	2009	2014

Search Celeron M 900 on Amazon

Search Pentium G3460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.