Celeron M 900 vs Phenom II X4 820
Celeron M 900
Phenom II X4 820
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 900 is positioned at rank 797 and the Phenom II X4 820 is on rank 916, so the Celeron M 900 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 900
Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 820
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron M 900 | Phenom II X4 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron M 900 | Phenom II X4 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+397%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 900 and Phenom II X4 820
Celeron M 900
The Celeron M 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,101 points. Launch price was $70.
Phenom II X4 820
The Phenom II X4 820 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,114 points. Launch price was $90.
Processing Power
The Celeron M 900 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Phenom II X4 820 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 820 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron M 900 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 820 — a 24% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 820. The Celeron M 900 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X4 820 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 900 scores 2,101 against the Phenom II X4 820's 2,114 — a 0.6% lead for the Phenom II X4 820.
| Feature | Celeron M 900 | Phenom II X4 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 4 / 4+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Deneb (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,101 | 2,114 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron M 900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom II X4 820 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron M 900 | Phenom II X4 820 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
Value Analysis
The Celeron M 900 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Phenom II X4 820 debuted at $150. At current prices ($10 vs $50), the Celeron M 900 is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 900 delivers 210.1 pts/$ vs 42.3 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 820 — making the Celeron M 900 the 133% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron M 900 | Phenom II X4 820 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86-43% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 210.1+397% | 42.3 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron M 900 and Phenom II X4 820
