Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G3440T

Intel

Celeron M 900

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium G3440T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2014
Similar parts
·······

Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G3440T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G3440T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G3440T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 900

2009

Why buy it

  • Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,101 vs 2,107).
  • Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Pentium G3440T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium G3440T

2014

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • 3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium G3440T better than Celeron M 900?
    Yes. Pentium G3440T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium G3440T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3440T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium G3440T is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium G3440T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 900 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (24.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Pentium G3440T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron M 900 vs Pentium G3440T Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron M 900

    The Celeron M 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,101 points. Launch price was $70.

    Intel

    Pentium G3440T

    The Pentium G3440T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,107 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Celeron M 900 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium G3440T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium G3440T has 1 more core. The Celeron M 900 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron M 900 scores 2,101 against the Pentium G3440T's 2,107 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium G3440T.

    FeatureCeleron M 900Pentium G3440T
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    2 / 2+100%
    Boost Clock
    2.2 GHz
    Base Clock
    2.8 GHz
    L3 Cache
    3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    Process
    45 nm
    22 nm-51%
    Architecture
    Penryn (2008−2011)
    PassMark
    2,101
    2,107
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron M 900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G3440T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCeleron M 900Pentium G3440T
    Socket
    PGA478
    LGA1150
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 3.0+173%