Celeron M 900
VS
Turion II Ultra M600

Celeron M 900 vs Turion II Ultra M600

Intel

Celeron M 900

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Turion II Ultra M600

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 900 is positioned at rank 797 and the Turion II Ultra M600 is on rank 260, so the Turion II Ultra M600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 900

#785
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1201%
#786
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1183%
#787
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1086%
#788
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1081%
#789
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1072%
#791
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1035%
#792
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
992%
#793
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
991%
#794
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
964%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion II Ultra M600

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
98%
#248
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
415%
#249
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
409%
#250
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
376%
#251
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
374%
#252
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
370%
#254
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
358%
#255
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
343%
#256
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
342%
#257
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
333%
#260
Turion II Ultra M600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Turion II Ultra M600 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron M 900 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron M 900Turion II Ultra M600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Caspian (2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron M 900Turion II Ultra M600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 900 and Turion II Ultra M600

Intel

Celeron M 900

The Celeron M 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,101 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

Turion II Ultra M600

The Turion II Ultra M600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,120 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 900 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Turion II Ultra M600 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Turion II Ultra M600 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron M 900 versus 2.4 GHz on the Turion II Ultra M600 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Turion II Ultra M600. The Celeron M 900 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion II Ultra M600 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 900 scores 2,101 against the Turion II Ultra M600's 2,120 — a 0.9% lead for the Turion II Ultra M600.

FeatureCeleron M 900Turion II Ultra M600
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz+9%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Caspian (2009)
PassMark
2,101
2,120
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 900 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion II Ultra M600 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron M 900Turion II Ultra M600
Socket
PGA478
S1g3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%