PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2807 vs Core i3-2125 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2807 vs Core i3-2125: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2807

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $27 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.6 vs 15.5 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (180 vs 499).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-2125.

Core i3-2125

2011

Why buy it

✅+177.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron N2807.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,082 vs 2,093).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2807 better than Core i3-2125?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i3-2125 is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2807 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2807 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2807 is the better buy right now. Celeron N2807 comes in $27 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i3-2125 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 25.9% better value on MSRP (19.6 vs 15.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2807 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2807 vs Core i3-2125 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2807

The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.

Core i3-2125

The Core i3-2125 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,082 points. Launch price was $170.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2807 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2125's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2807 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i3-2125 — a 41.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-2125 (base: 1.58 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Celeron N2807 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-2125 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2807 scores 2,093 against the Core i3-2125's 2,082 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron N2807. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 499, a 94% lead for the Core i3-2125 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2807 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2125.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Core i3-2125
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	3.3 GHz+53%
Base Clock	1.58 GHz	3.3 GHz+109%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	2,093	2,082
Geekbench 6 Single	180	499+177%
Geekbench 6 Multi	320	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2807 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2125 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The Core i3-2125 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron N2807) vs 2 (Core i3-2125). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2807) vs 16 (Core i3-2125) — the Core i3-2125 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2807) and H61,H67,P67,Z68,B65,Q65,Q67,B75,Q75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i3-2125).

Feature	Celeron N2807	Core i3-2125
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2807) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2125). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2807) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2125) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2807 targets Netbook, Core i3-2125 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010; Core i3-2125 rivals A8-3850.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Core i3-2125
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Netbook	Budget Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N2807 was priced at $107, while the Core i3-2125 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($107 vs $134), Celeron N2807 was $27 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N2807 delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 15.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-2125 — making the Celeron N2807 the 22.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Core i3-2125
MSRP	$107-20%	$134
Performance per Dollar	19.6+26%	15.5
Release Date	2014	2011

Search Celeron N2807 on Amazon

Search Core i3-2125 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.