Celeron N2807 vs Phenom II X4 820

Celeron N2807 vs Phenom II X4 820 Performance Spectrum

Celeron N2807

2 / 2

2,093

0.0%

2,114

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2807 vs Phenom II X4 820 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2807 vs Phenom II X4 820: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2807

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $43 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.6 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Draws 4W instead of 95W, a 91W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,093 vs 2,114).

Phenom II X4 820

2009

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2807 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.1 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
❌2275% higher power demand at 95W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2807 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2807 better than Phenom II X4 820?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2807 is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 820 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom II X4 820 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2807 is the better buy right now. Celeron N2807 comes in $43 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Phenom II X4 820 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 38.8% better value on MSRP (19.6 vs 14.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2807 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2807 vs Phenom II X4 820 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2807

The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom II X4 820

The Phenom II X4 820 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,114 points. Launch price was $90.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2807 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 820 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 820 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2807 versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 820 — a 25.8% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 820 (base: 1.58 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron N2807 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X4 820 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2807 scores 2,093 against the Phenom II X4 820's 2,114 — a 1% lead for the Phenom II X4 820. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2807 vs 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 820.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Phenom II X4 820
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	2.8 GHz+30%
Base Clock	1.58 GHz	2.8 GHz+77%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	2,093	2,114+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	320	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2807 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X4 820 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Phenom II X4 820
Socket	FCBGA1170	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron N2807) / not specified (Phenom II X4 820). The Celeron N2807 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Phenom II X4 820 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2807 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Phenom II X4 820
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Netbook	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N2807 was priced at $107, while the Phenom II X4 820 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($107 vs $150), Celeron N2807 was $43 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N2807 delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 14.1 pts/$ for the Phenom II X4 820 — making the Celeron N2807 the 32.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Phenom II X4 820
MSRP	$107-29%	$150
Performance per Dollar	19.6+39%	14.1
Release Date	2014	2009

Search Celeron N2807 on Amazon

Search Phenom II X4 820 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.