
Celeron N2807

Pentium G3460
Celeron N2807 vs Pentium G3460 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N2807 vs Pentium G3460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N2807 vs Pentium G3460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N2807
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $42 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.6 vs 14.2 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 54W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium G3460 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,093 vs 2,114).
Pentium G3460
2014Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.2 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ❌1250% higher power demand at 54W vs 4W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2807 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G3460 better than Celeron N2807?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N2807 vs Pentium G3460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2807
The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium G3460
The Pentium G3460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,114 points. Launch price was $89.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron N2807 and Pentium G3460 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2807 versus 3.5 GHz on the Pentium G3460 — a 47.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G3460 (base: 1.58 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Celeron N2807 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium G3460 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2807 scores 2,093 against the Pentium G3460's 2,114 — a 1% lead for the Pentium G3460. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2807 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3460.
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Pentium G3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.16 GHz | 3.5 GHz+62% |
| Base Clock | 1.58 GHz | 3.5 GHz+122% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 2,093 | 2,114+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 320 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N2807 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3460 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Pentium G3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron N2807) / not specified (Pentium G3460). The Celeron N2807 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium G3460 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2807 targets Netbook. Direct competitor: Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010.
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Pentium G3460 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Netbook | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron N2807 was priced at $107, while the Pentium G3460 came in at $149. On launch pricing ($107 vs $149), Celeron N2807 was $42 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N2807 delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 14.2 pts/$ for the Pentium G3460 — making the Celeron N2807 the 31.8% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Pentium G3460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-28% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6+38% | 14.2 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














