
Celeron N2807

Pentium G2140
Celeron N2807 vs Pentium G2140 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N2807 vs Pentium G2140 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N2807 vs Pentium G2140: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N2807
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 55W, a 51W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (320 vs 920).
- ❌7% HIGHER MSRP$107 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Pentium G2140.
Pentium G2140
2013Why buy it
- ✅+187.5% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅Costs $7 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Celeron N2807.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2807 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌1275% higher power demand at 55W vs 4W.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron N2807 better than Pentium G2140?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N2807 vs Pentium G2140 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2807
The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium G2140
The Pentium G2140 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron N2807 and Pentium G2140 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron N2807 is built on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N2807 scores 2,093 against the Pentium G2140's 2,092 — a 0% lead for the Celeron N2807. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 550, a 101.4% lead for the Pentium G2140 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 320 vs 920 (96.8% advantage for the Pentium G2140). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2807 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G2140.
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Pentium G2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.16 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.58 GHz | 3.3 GHz+109% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | — |
| PassMark | 2,093 | 2,092 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | 550+206% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 320 | 920+188% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N2807 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G2140 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron N2807 versus DDR3-1600 on the Pentium G2140 — the Pentium G2140 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G2140 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron N2807) vs 2 (Pentium G2140). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2807) vs 16 (Pentium G2140) — the Pentium G2140 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2807) and H61,B75 (Pentium G2140).
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Pentium G2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333 | DDR3-1600+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 32 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2807) and Intel HD Graphics (Pentium G2140) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2807 targets Netbook, Pentium G2140 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010.
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Pentium G2140 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Netbook | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron N2807 was priced at $107, while the Pentium G2140 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($107 vs $100), Pentium G2140 was $7 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N2807 delivers 19.6 pts/$ vs 20.9 pts/$ for the Pentium G2140 — making the Pentium G2140 the 6.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron N2807 | Pentium G2140 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107 | $100-7% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.6 | 20.9+7% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














