Celeron N2807 vs Celeron B810

Celeron N2807

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2014

Celeron B810

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron N2807

2 / 2

2,093

+0.1%

2,091

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2807 is positioned at rank 51 and the Celeron B810 is on rank 801, so the Celeron N2807 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2807

#13

Ryzen 3 210

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

96%

#39

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

210%

#40

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

207%

#41

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

190%

#42

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

189%

#43

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

188%

#45

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

181%

#46

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

174%

#47

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

173%

#48

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

169%

#51

Celeron N2807

MSRP: $107|Avg: $60

100%

#65

Core i5-3320M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

95%

#66

Core i7-4510U

MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B810

#789

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1207%

#790

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1189%

#791

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1092%

#792

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1087%

#793

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1077%

#795

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1040%

#796

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

997%

#797

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

995%

#798

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

969%

#801

Celeron B810

MSRP: $86|Avg: $86

100%

#803

Core i7-1365UE

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

100%

#805

3020e

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

99%

#809

Athlon II M320

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

98%

#810

Celeron B800

MSRP: $80|Avg: $5

98%

#811

Celeron B710

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

98%

#812

Athlon II Neo K345

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron N2807 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron B810 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Celeron N2807	Celeron B810
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($60)	⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron N2807 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 30% cheaper ($60 vs $86) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Celeron N2807	Celeron B810
Cost Efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+43%)	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($60)	⚠️ Higher cost ($86)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron N2807 Benchmark Check

Celeron B810 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2807 and Celeron B810

Celeron N2807

The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron B810

The Celeron B810 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,091 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2807 and Celeron B810 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2807 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B810 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N2807 (base: 1.58 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron N2807 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron B810 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2807 scores 2,093 against the Celeron B810's 2,091 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron N2807. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2807 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B810.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Celeron B810
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz+35%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.58 GHz	1.6 GHz+1%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	2,093	2,091
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	320	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2807 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron B810 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The Celeron B810 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron N2807) vs 2 (Celeron B810). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2807) vs 16 (Celeron B810) — the Celeron B810 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2807) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B810).

Feature	Celeron N2807	Celeron B810
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2807) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B810) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2807 targets Netbook, Celeron B810 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010; Celeron B810 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron N2807	Celeron B810
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Netbook	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron N2807 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Celeron B810 debuted at $86. At current prices ($60 vs $86), the Celeron N2807 is $26 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N2807 delivers 34.9 pts/$ vs 24.3 pts/$ for the Celeron B810 — making the Celeron N2807 the 35.7% better value option.