Celeron N2807 vs A6-3650

Celeron N2807

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2014

A6-3650

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron N2807

2 / 2

2,093

0.0%

2,098

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2807 is positioned at rank 51 and the A6-3650 is on rank 832, so the Celeron N2807 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2807

#13

Ryzen 3 210

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

96%

#39

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

210%

#40

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

207%

#41

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

190%

#42

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

189%

#43

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

188%

#45

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

181%

#46

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

174%

#47

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

173%

#48

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

169%

#51

Celeron N2807

MSRP: $107|Avg: $60

100%

#65

Core i5-3320M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

95%

#66

Core i7-4510U

MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3650

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

17090%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

16148%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

11725%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

3532%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

2798%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

2448%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

1402%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

1384%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

1260%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

1260%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

1246%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

1212%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

1195%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

1190%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

1179%

#295

Core i9-7940X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275

100%

#832

A6-3650

MSRP: $115|Avg: $20

100%

#833

Core i7-4770R

MSRP: $360|Avg: $89

100%

#835

Core i7-2600

MSRP: $294|Avg: $50

100%

#836

Pentium G870

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

100%

#837

Athlon II X2 210e

MSRP: $60|Avg: $28

100%

#838

Pentium G645

MSRP: $80|Avg: $15

99%

#840

Pentium G630

MSRP: $75|Avg: $46

99%

#841

Core i5-2550K

MSRP: $235|Avg: $46

99%

#842

Athlon II X4 600e

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

98%

#843

Core i7-4785T

MSRP: $306|Avg: $32

98%

#844

Core i5-6442EQ

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

98%

#845

Core i5-4690S

MSRP: $306|Avg: $189

98%

#846

Core i3-3250

MSRP: $138|Avg: $40

98%

#847

Core i3-3240

MSRP: $132|Avg: $15

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A6-3650 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron N2807 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Celeron N2807	A6-3650
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($60)	✅ More affordable ($20)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the A6-3650 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 67% cheaper ($20 vs $60) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Celeron N2807	A6-3650
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+201%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($60)	✅ More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron N2807 Benchmark Check

A6-3650 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2807 and A6-3650

Celeron N2807

The Celeron N2807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.58 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.3 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,093 points. Launch price was $107.

A6-3650

The A6-3650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,098 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2807 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A6-3650 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3650 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2807 versus 2.6 GHz on the A6-3650 — a 18.5% clock advantage for the A6-3650 (base: 1.58 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron N2807 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the A6-3650 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2807 scores 2,093 against the A6-3650's 2,098 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-3650. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 311, a 53.4% lead for the A6-3650 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N2807	A6-3650
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	2.6 GHz+20%
Base Clock	1.58 GHz	2.6 GHz+65%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark	2,093	2,098
Geekbench 6 Single	180	311+73%
Geekbench 6 Multi	320	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2807 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-3650 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The A6-3650 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron N2807) vs 2 (A6-3650). PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2807) vs 16 (A6-3650) — the A6-3650 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2807) and A55,A75 (A6-3650).

Feature	Celeron N2807	A6-3650
Socket	FCBGA1170	FM1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2807) vs AMD-V (A6-3650). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2807) and Radeon HD 6530D (A6-3650) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2807 targets Netbook, A6-3650 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2807 rivals AMD E1-6010; A6-3650 rivals Pentium G850.

Feature	Celeron N2807	A6-3650
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	Radeon HD 6530D
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	AMD-V
Target Use	Netbook	Budget Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron N2807 launched at $107 MSRP, while the A6-3650 debuted at $115. At current prices ($60 vs $20), the A6-3650 is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N2807 delivers 34.9 pts/$ vs 104.9 pts/$ for the A6-3650 — making the A6-3650 the 100.2% better value option.