Celeron N2830 vs Core 2 Duo T9800

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2830 vs Core 2 Duo T9800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2830 vs Core 2 Duo T9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2830

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Core 2 Duo T9800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,189).
❌16.7% higher power demand at 7W vs 6W.

Core 2 Duo T9800

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 7W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2830 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T9800 better than Celeron N2830?

Yes. Core 2 Duo T9800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo T9800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T9800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T9800 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T9800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2830 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2830 vs Core 2 Duo T9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2830

The Celeron N2830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $107.

Core 2 Duo T9800

The Core 2 Duo T9800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 2.92 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $530.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2830 and Core 2 Duo T9800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.41 GHz on the Celeron N2830 versus 2.92 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9800 — a 19.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9800 (base: 2.16 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Celeron N2830 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2830 scores 1,185 against the Core 2 Duo T9800's 1,189 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9800. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2830 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9800.

Feature	Celeron N2830	Core 2 Duo T9800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.41 GHz	2.92 GHz+21%
Base Clock	2.16 GHz	2.93 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+8433%	6 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,185	1,189

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2830 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2830	Core 2 Duo T9800
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N2830) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T9800). The Celeron N2830 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2830 rivals AMD A6-6310.