Celeron N2830
VS
Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Celeron N2830 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Intel

Celeron N2830

2 Cores2 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.41 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2830 is positioned at rank 82 and the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is on rank 561, so the Celeron N2830 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2830

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
92%
#70
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
248%
#71
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
244%
#72
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
224%
#73
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
223%
#74
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
221%
#76
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
213%
#77
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
205%
#78
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
204%
#79
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
199%
#82
Celeron N2830
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#88
Core 2 Duo T7500
MSRP: $316|Avg: $5
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 X2 TL-50

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
99%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
98%
#549
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
743%
#550
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
732%
#551
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
672%
#552
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
669%
#553
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
663%
#555
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
640%
#556
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
614%
#557
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
613%
#558
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
597%
#561
Turion 64 X2 TL-50
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N2830 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron N2830Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Taylor (2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron N2830Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2830 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Intel

Celeron N2830

The Celeron N2830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 17 May 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Taylor (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $154.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2830 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.41 GHz on the Celeron N2830 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 — a 40.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N2830. The Celeron N2830 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses Taylor (2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2830 scores 1,185 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-50's 1,184 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron N2830.

FeatureCeleron N2830Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.41 GHz+51%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.16 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB
Process
22 nm-76%
90 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Taylor (2006)
PassMark
1,185
1,184
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2830 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N2830Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Socket
FCBGA1170
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N2830) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-50). The Celeron N2830 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2830 rivals AMD A6-6310.

FeatureCeleron N2830Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true