Celeron N2830 vs Pentium E6600

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2830 vs Pentium E6600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2830 vs Pentium E6600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2830

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium E6600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,194).

Pentium E6600

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Celeron N2830 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2830 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2830 better than Pentium E6600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2830 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E6600 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E6600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2830 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2830 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium E6600 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (14.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2830 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2830 vs Pentium E6600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2830

The Celeron N2830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium E6600

The Pentium E6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,194 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2830 and Pentium E6600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.41 GHz on the Celeron N2830 versus 0.07 GHz on the Pentium E6600 — a 188.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N2830 (base: 2.16 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Celeron N2830 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium E6600 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2830 scores 1,185 against the Pentium E6600's 1,194 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium E6600. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N2830	Pentium E6600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.41 GHz+3343%	0.07 GHz
Base Clock	2.16 GHz	3.06 GHz+42%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB (total)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,185	1,194

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2830 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2830	Pentium E6600
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N2830) / not specified (Pentium E6600). The Celeron N2830 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium E6600 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2830 rivals AMD A6-6310.