Celeron N2910 vs Core i3-4130T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i3-4130T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i3-4130T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2910

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 7W instead of 35W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-4130T.

Core i3-4130T

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron N2910.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2910 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,876 vs 2,907).
❌Launch MSRP is still $124 MSRP, while Celeron N2910 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 35W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2910 better than Core i3-4130T?

Yes. Celeron N2910 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2910 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2910 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2910 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2910 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $124 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4130T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2910 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i3-4130T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2910

The Celeron N2910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,907 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4130T

The Core i3-4130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,876 points. Launch price was $270.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2910 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4130T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N2910 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron N2910 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-4130T — a 57.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-4130T (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Celeron N2910 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-4130T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2910 scores 2,907 against the Core i3-4130T's 2,876 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron N2910. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 210 vs 890, a 123.6% lead for the Core i3-4130T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2910 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4130T.

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i3-4130T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.9 GHz+81%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.9 GHz+81%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,907+1%	2,876
Geekbench 6 Single	210	890+324%
Geekbench 6 Multi	700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2910 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4130T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2910 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4130T — the Core i3-4130T supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-4130T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2910) vs 16 (Core i3-4130T) — the Core i3-4130T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2910) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4130T).

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i3-4130T
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2910) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4130T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2910) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4130T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2910 targets Budget Laptop, Core i3-4130T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2910 rivals AMD A4-6210; Core i3-4130T rivals A8-7600.

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i3-4130T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Budget Laptop	Low Power Desktop