Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-3360M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-3360M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-3360M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2910

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 7W instead of 512W, a 505W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-3360M

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron N2910 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,892 vs 2,907).
❌7214.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 7W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2910 better than Core i5-3360M?

Yes. Celeron N2910 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2910 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2910 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2910 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2910 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2910 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2910 vs Core i5-3360M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2910

The Celeron N2910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,907 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-3360M

The Core i5-3360M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2910 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3360M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N2910 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron N2910 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-3360M — a 74.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-3360M (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron N2910 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-3360M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2910 scores 2,907 against the Core i5-3360M's 2,892 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron N2910. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2910 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3360M.

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i5-3360M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	3.5 GHz+119%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,907	2,892
Geekbench 6 Single	210	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2910 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3360M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Celeron N2910 versus 1600 on the Core i5-3360M — the Core i5-3360M supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3360M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2910) vs 16 (Core i5-3360M) — the Core i5-3360M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2910) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3360M).

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i5-3360M
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron N2910) vs true (Core i5-3360M). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2910) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3360M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N2910 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron N2910 rivals AMD A4-6210; Core i5-3360M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

Feature	Celeron N2910	Core i5-3360M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget Laptop	—