
Celeron N3010

Pentium T2370
Celeron N3010 vs Pentium T2370 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N3010 vs Pentium T2370 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N3010 vs Pentium T2370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N3010
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Pentium T2370 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium T2370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (735 vs 745).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 8.7 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
Pentium T2370
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 26.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.7 vs 6.9 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3010 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium T2370 better than Celeron N3010?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N3010 vs Pentium T2370 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3010
The Celeron N3010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 735 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium T2370
The Pentium T2370 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 745 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron N3010 is built on the Airmont (2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N3010 scores 735 against the Pentium T2370's 745 — a 1.4% lead for the Pentium T2370. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3010 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2370.
| Feature | Celeron N3010 | Pentium T2370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.24 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.04 GHz | 1.73 GHz+66% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | — |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Airmont (2016) | — |
| PassMark | 735 | 745+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N3010 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium T2370 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron N3010 | Pentium T2370 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Celeron N3010) / not specified (Pentium T2370). The Celeron N3010 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium T2370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3010 targets Budget Mobile.
| Feature | Celeron N3010 | Pentium T2370 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 400 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
| Target Use | Budget Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron N3010 was priced at $107, while the Pentium T2370 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($107 vs $86), Pentium T2370 was $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3010 delivers 6.9 pts/$ vs 8.7 pts/$ for the Pentium T2370 — making the Pentium T2370 the 23.1% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron N3010 | Pentium T2370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107 | $86-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.9 | 8.7+26% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














