
Celeron N3010

Ryzen 7 5700X
Celeron N3010 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N3010 vs Ryzen 7 5700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron N3010 vs Ryzen 7 5700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N3010
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $192 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (735 vs 26,609).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +1239.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 1195.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 6.9 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
- ✅500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌179.4% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$107 MSRP
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3010 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Celeron N3010?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N3010 vs Ryzen 7 5700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3010
The Celeron N3010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 735 points. Launch price was $107.


Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Celeron N3010 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3010 versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X — a 69% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 1.04 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Celeron N3010 uses the Airmont (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3010 scores 735 against the Ryzen 7 5700X's 26,609 — a 189.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3010 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X.
| Feature | Celeron N3010 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2.24 GHz | 4.6 GHz+105% |
| Base Clock | 1.04 GHz | 3.4 GHz+227% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Airmont (2016) | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 735 | 26,609+3520% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,116 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,715 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N3010 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Celeron N3010 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X — the Ryzen 7 5700X supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N3010) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Braswell (Celeron N3010) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X).
| Feature | Celeron N3010 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 24+500% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Celeron N3010) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X). The Celeron N3010 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3010 targets Budget Mobile, Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Celeron N3010 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 400 | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget Mobile | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron N3010 was priced at $107, while the Ryzen 7 5700X came in at $299. On launch pricing ($107 vs $299), Celeron N3010 was $192 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3010 delivers 6.9 pts/$ vs 89.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5700X — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 171.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron N3010 | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-64% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.9 | 89.0+1190% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














