Celeron N4500 vs Core i3-2367M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2367M

#42

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A

96%

#136

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

321%

#137

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

316%

#138

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

291%

#139

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

289%

#140

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

287%

#142

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

277%

#143

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

265%

#144

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

265%

#145

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

258%

#148

Core i3-2367M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#158

Core i5-3210M

MSRP: $225|Avg: $30

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N4500 (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron N4500	Core i3-2367M
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-2367M (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron N4500	Core i3-2367M
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron N4500 Benchmark Check

Core i3-2367M Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N4500 and Core i3-2367M

Celeron N4500

The Celeron N4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-2367M

The Core i3-2367M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,827 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N4500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2367M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4500 versus 1.4 GHz on the Core i3-2367M — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N4500 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Celeron N4500 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-2367M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N4500 scores 1,817 against the Core i3-2367M's 1,827 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-2367M. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4500 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2367M.

Feature	Celeron N4500	Core i3-2367M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+100%	1.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	1.4 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)+500%	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,817	1,827

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N4500 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-2367M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N4500	Core i3-2367M
Socket	BGA1338	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	1333
Max RAM Capacity	—	16
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N4500) / true (Core i3-2367M). The Core i3-2367M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Celeron N4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2367M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.