A8-5557M vs Celeron N4500

A8-5557M vs Celeron N4500 Performance Spectrum

A8-5557M

4 / 4

1,831

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N4500

2 / 2

1,817

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-5557M vs Celeron N4500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-5557M vs Celeron N4500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-5557M

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G, while Celeron N4500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.

Celeron N4500

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A8-5557M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,817 vs 1,831).
❌No integrated graphics, while A8-5557M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-5557M better than Celeron N4500?

Yes. A8-5557M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-5557M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-5557M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-5557M still makes the most sense overall. A8-5557M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N4500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A8-5557M vs Celeron N4500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-5557M

The A8-5557M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $90.

Celeron N4500

The Celeron N4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-5557M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N4500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A8-5557M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-5557M versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N4500 — a 10.2% clock advantage for the A8-5557M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A8-5557M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N4500 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A8-5557M scores 1,831 against the Celeron N4500's 1,817 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-5557M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-5557M vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4500.

Feature	A8-5557M	Celeron N4500
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+11%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+91%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1.5 MB (total)+50%
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	1,831	1,817

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-5557M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N4500 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A8-5557M	Celeron N4500
Socket	FP2	BGA1338
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (A8-5557M) / not specified (Celeron N4500). The A8-5557M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G / 8550G), while the Celeron N4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A8-5557M rivals Core i3-4000M.