Celeron N5100 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5100 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5100 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5100

2021

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 80W, a 74W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2407 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-2407 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,272 vs 3,305).
❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Celeron N5100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1233.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 6W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N5100 better than Xeon E5-2407 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2407 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron N5100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N5100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N5100 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2407 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Celeron N5100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2407 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2407 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N5100 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5100

The Celeron N5100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,305 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5-2407 v2

The Xeon E5-2407 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,272 points. Launch price was $476.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N5100 and Xeon E5-2407 v2 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron N5100 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 v2 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N5100 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron N5100 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5100 scores 3,305 against the Xeon E5-2407 v2's 3,272 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N5100. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5100 vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407 v2.

Feature	Celeron N5100	Xeon E5-2407 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+17%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.4 GHz+118%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)+500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	3,305+1%	3,272

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5100 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2407 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.