Celeron N5105 vs Celeron N5095A

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Celeron N5095A shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.

Insight	Celeron N5105	Celeron N5095A
Gaming	Balanced gaming performance	Balanced gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)	✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Celeron N5105	Celeron N5095A
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron N5105 Benchmark Check

Celeron N5095A Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095A

Celeron N5105

The Celeron N5105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,003 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,054 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N5105 and Celeron N5095A share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5105 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095A — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron N5105 scores 4,003 against the Celeron N5095A's 4,054 — a 1.3% lead for the Celeron N5095A. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N5105 vs 4 MB on the Celeron N5095A.

Feature	Celeron N5105	Celeron N5095A
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)	1.5 MB
Process	10 nm	10 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark	4,003	4,054+1%